Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 9 results ...
Apollo, M and Burkacki, D (2024) Key success factors for small design offices in the bidding process. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 32–46.
Gamal, A, Nashaat, B, Shahda, M M and Nosier, S R (2024) Ten questions concerning the integration of digital fabrication techniques into the architectural design process. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 120–49.
Goncikowski, M (2024) Research by design – determining the form of the initial architectural concept of a skyscraper building in Warsaw. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 1–31.
Lotfabadi, P and Iranmanesh, A (2024) Evaluation of learning methods in architecture design studio via analytic hierarchy process: a case study. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 47–64.
Mahmoudi Motahar, M, Hosseini Nourzad, S H and Rahimi, F (2024) Integrating complete disassembly planning with deconstructability assessment to facilitate designing deconstructable buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 150–67.
Rapheal, O, Adedeji, A, Opeyemi, O and Olugbenro, O (2024) Modelling client and construction firm barriers hindering social client relationship management system implementation in the built environment. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 102–19.
Rizi, R A, Bagherzadeh, F, Schnabel, M A and Bakshi, N (2024) A design methodology to consider occupants’ spatial adjustment and manage view content in adaptive façade design for improving visual comfort. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 168–90.
Tabarroki, S, Nazari, A and Banihashemi, S (2024) Risk stages and factors in architectural design- A structural equation modelling. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 79–101.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Design process; architectural design; design error; risk modelling; construction projects;
- ISBN/ISSN: 1745-2007
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2267559
- Abstract:
The design phase is one of the key project processes in the construction industry. Despite the architects’ responsibility to develop complete, accurate and coordinated project documents, architectural design is accompanied by multiple errors and consequential risks. That is, the errors are potentially costly and time-consuming to correct and impose significant risks if are not caught early during the design phase, and become cumbersome to be handled in the construction documents and the construction phase. The aim of this research is to identify the risky stages in the architectural design process and find what factors cause risks in that process within the context of Iran. To this end, a combination of a qualitative and quantitative method as the sequential mixed-method was designed in which the research was commenced through the qualitative exploratory investigation to discover the literature and then, proceeded to the quantitative research including questionnaire design, model structure development and the Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) application and analysis. The results of the study reveal that the greatest design risks may occur in the identification and investigation phase of the Iranian architectural design process when the feasibility studies and planning are not conducted accurately, correctly and completely. Moreover, the outcome shows that time pressures in design data collection, ambiguous objectives of the clients, and poor disciplinary coordination are the main risk factors in architectural design.
Van Nguyen, M and Ha, K D (2024) A corporate social responsibility implementation index for architectural design firms in Vietnam. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(01), 65–78.